Safely manage your Zendesk from the AI assistant you already use, via the Deltastring MCP. Beacon configuration platform →
← Back to news
ai

Rival AI agents, Instinct and Meta’s Muse, both add the ability to make calls

Instinct and Meta's Muse have both deployed outbound calling capabilities within days of each other, erasing a competitive advantage that had previously differentiated the field. Instinct's Concierge feature handles phone-based tasks like restaurant reservations and service cancellations, whilst Muse gained the ability to place calls to U.S. businesses through a phased rollout prioritising users who requested the feature. This parity matters because calling represents a critical capability gap in agentic AI—the ability to operate across channels that still require human voice interaction. Instinct's momentum is undeniable: the startup commands a $10 billion valuation and raised $350 million last month, with investors betting heavily on multi-surface AI assistants. Yet Muse's rapid feature matching, combined with its 730,000 U.S. downloads in the first few days post-launch, signals that Meta's distribution advantage and engineering velocity can compress development timelines that would typically favour smaller, focused competitors.

The implications for CX teams are twofold. First, the calling feature arms race reflects a broader shift toward agents that handle tasks across voice, email, and chat—the exact omnichannel orchestration that support leaders have struggled to implement manually. This raises a critical question: as consumer-facing AI agents mature in handling transactional work, how should enterprise CX platforms like Zendesk and Salesforce position themselves relative to these consumer-grade alternatives? The risk is not that Instinct or Muse will replace enterprise systems, but that they'll absorb routine customer interactions before they reach your support queue, fundamentally altering contact volume and complexity profiles. Second, Google's pivot of CC toward household coordination demonstrates that agentic AI is fragmenting across use cases rather than consolidating into a single platform. This fragmentation creates an integration challenge: teams will need to manage multiple AI agents operating in customer-adjacent spaces, each with different data access models and permission structures.

The competitive velocity here should concern CX leaders planning multi-year technology roadmaps. Instinct and Muse shipped calling features within the same week; Google repositioned CC from productivity to household management based on user demand signals. This pace suggests that feature parity will become the baseline expectation, not the differentiator. For teams already running Agentforce or similar enterprise agents, the question becomes whether your platform can match this iteration speed whilst maintaining the compliance, security, and audit trails that regulated industries demand—or whether you'll need to integrate third-party agents into your CX stack, adding operational complexity.